twotoedsloth: (Default)
[personal profile] twotoedsloth
...and I remembered how, at least in the early nineties (okay, maybe late eighties), it was said that you were making an appropriate income if you were earning your age. In thousands, that is... I realize that inflation might have adjusted this a bit, but I was thinking about the fact that I only managed that once in my life, and it didn't last too long.

And then I thought...the thing with that formula is that it assumes that your salary is somehow negotiable, but that your age is not. So then I thought, what if your age was negotiable, but your income had to be pegged to your age? Obviously, in this system, nobody would be terribly wealthy. But, say you could choose to be any age from, say, 18-80, and that would determine your income. You would be subject to age appropriate health probabilities, and so on. So, if that were the case, what would you choose?
From:
Anonymous( )Anonymous This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID( )OpenID You can comment on this post while signed in with an account from many other sites, once you have confirmed your email address. Sign in using OpenID.
User
Account name:
Password:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
Subject:
HTML doesn't work in the subject.

Message:

 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.

Profile

twotoedsloth: (Default)
twotoedsloth

July 2010

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314 151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 25th, 2017 11:59 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios